Our research outlines seven intersecting themes that characterise the changed covid landscape for corruption risk in the approval of mining licensing.
Australia’s mining sector is not immune to corruption. By working collaboratively to strengthen transparency and accountability, we can ensure it performs to the highest standards of integrity.
This timeline shows the progress of the Accountable Mining Program in Australia, the collaboration with our diverse range of stakeholders, and events that have showcased our work.
These maps help stakeholders identify points within the process of approving mining rights where transparency and public accountability need to be strengthened. As mining licence processes differ across Australian jurisdictions, these maps focus on the mining-rich states of Queensland and Western Australia.
In our latest research, our colleagues from Argentina, Mexico, Ghana, Madagascar and the Kyrgyz Republic have completed a year-long investigation into the corruption risks in the process of approving mining rights in their countries.
The MACRA Tool fills helps users to identify and assess the underlying causes of corruption in mining sector awards.
The extractive sector is notoriously prone to corruption. EITI stakeholders are working to strengthen the EITI’s contribution to tackling corruption.
What is the process for awarding mining rights in Cambodia? What steps must the company and the government follow? This map provides transparency.
This factsheet provides a brief overview of the MACRA Tool, which helps users identify and assess the underlying causes of corruption in mining sector awards.
The MACRA Tool fills helps users to identify and assess the underlying causes of corruption in mining sector awards. Available in English, French, Spanish and Mandarin.